Author Topic: Rule Discussion #5  (Read 442 times)

GM Justin

  • Supreme Basketball Alliance sim Moderator
  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ****
  • Posts: 2456
  • Beef / Broccoli 19
  • Batter up!
    • View Profile
Rule Discussion #5
« on: January 20, 2017, 09:50:13 AM »
**Putting this here for Ed, figured it needed its own thread**

I think if team A does all it needs too and locks in and then team they are playing team B adds any new players from a trade or other acquisition, then team A should be unlocked to allow any changes to strategy.

GM Pancho

  • IMPACT BOWL V CHAMPION!
  • The 500 Post Club
  • **
  • Posts: 784
  • Beef / Broccoli 16
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2017, 10:33:25 AM »
Negative. That's like saying if a team changes they're strategy after I lock let me unlock to match up better

GM Jon

  • IMPACT BOWL VI AND VII CHAMPION!
  • Prediction Admin / PBL Moderator
  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 3284
  • Beef / Broccoli 1334
  • Quiffy
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2017, 10:42:07 AM »
Disapprove.

Pancho pretty much nailed it on the head.



  

GM Metroll

  • EAT, SLEEP, TRAPE, REPEAT
  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ***
  • Posts: 2481
  • Beef / Broccoli 788
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2017, 10:55:32 AM »
No - because you gameplan for what the other team is going to do - not the players. Just because a new player comes in doesn't mean the teams strategy changes.

GM Cory

  • The 500 Post Club
  • **
  • Posts: 805
  • Beef / Broccoli 2
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2017, 12:03:54 PM »
No.

GM Lucas

  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ***
  • Posts: 2489
  • Beef / Broccoli 24
  • Winning starts Now!
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2017, 12:09:59 PM »
The vote isn't to change a lock in after someone does a lock in I don't like, all this was is if You lock in then another team gets the best qb or the best RB, now you can't prepare for an awesome running game. That is it. Just if there is a trade after a lock in. No one is saying keep going back and fourth.

GM Jon

  • IMPACT BOWL VI AND VII CHAMPION!
  • Prediction Admin / PBL Moderator
  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 3284
  • Beef / Broccoli 1334
  • Quiffy
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2017, 12:17:01 PM »
I know what you are saying... I still say no.



  

GM Gates

  • Impact Bowl 8 & 9 Champion
  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ***
  • Posts: 1963
  • Beef / Broccoli 19
  • 2x Impact Bowl Champion
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2017, 12:20:03 PM »
I'd say no for many of the reasons already stated above.

GM Pancho

  • IMPACT BOWL V CHAMPION!
  • The 500 Post Club
  • **
  • Posts: 784
  • Beef / Broccoli 16
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2017, 12:32:27 PM »
The vote isn't to change a lock in after someone does a lock in I don't like, all this was is if You lock in then another team gets the best qb or the best RB, now you can't prepare for an awesome running game. That is it. Just if there is a trade after a lock in. No one is saying keep going back and fourth.

Classic case of sucks to suck

GM TJ II

  • The 1,000 Post Club
  • ***
  • Posts: 3138
  • Beef / Broccoli -2
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2017, 12:49:53 PM »
Going to vote no.

Talon

  • High Impact Football League Commissioner
  • Administrator
  • The 30,000 Post Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 36721
  • Beef / Broccoli 50019
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Discussion #5
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2017, 12:51:15 PM »
I'm not going to open that can of worms. 
Quote
GM Kirk [21|May 12:29 AM]:   When trade fever hits, math is the first casualty.